Hillary gets Emotional, and other irrelevant information
In recent headlines, Hillary Clinton was apparently near tears when expressing how she felt about our country. It was all over CNN and other various news outlets. My question is this; How is that relevant news? You don’t think most, if not all candidates, deeply care about this country? Why is this making headlines over other important news, like actually reporting the rare times when a presidential nominee actually says what they would do, specifically, as president? Instead of, you know, when they talk about their “feelings”. Oh, and btw (by the way) candidates, if any of you ever read this, you can’t say you are the candidate for change, and then proceed to not tell me how you are going to change it.
Instead of showing Hillary getting emotional over and over again, and instead of playing Barack Obama snippets all day long, why not actually show more of what is being said by other candidates. The only time i really heard of any news agency reporting what Chris Dodd and Joe Biden said was when they made their “dropping out of the race” speech. Perhaps if the news reported what they said, they’d still be around. Even Edwards doesn’t get proper exposure. Yes, the news mentions him a lot, but they never show him actually giving a speech personally. They always show Hillary and Obama giving their speeches. What gives media?
So, to attempt to correct this, i am going to post one interview of John Edwards. I found one of him as recently as 1/6/08, but it doesn’t seem to load, so this is one from last month. Still pretty recent. It doesn’t give too much information straight out, but hey, what candidate ever does?
Comments
Leave a Reply
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. - Blogarama - The Blog Directory
-
